How this committee-throughput packet is modeled and what it is safe to infer from it.

Committee capacity becomes a board decision.

Executives can see which lanes need more meeting capacity, cleaner agendas, faster escalation, or a deliberate deferral before another strategic ask enters the room.

One typed model powers every surface.

The CLI, JSON APIs, prerendered HTML, screenshots, and verification notes all resolve from the same TypeScript evidence model so the story stays reproducible.

Throughput risk is easier to buy than calendar noise.

This turns vague meeting overload into a SaaS value architecture narrative: exposed capacity, recoverable operating focus, investment readiness, and board-safe ownership.

Each product starts with a board-facing exposure that can be scored, compared, and routed.

Every lane names the operating owner, board audience, and intervention path instead of stopping at dashboard metrics.

The public page, README, CLI, JSON payloads, and screenshots all package the same proof in different buyer-readable forms.

The output always resolves into an action leaders can defend: add capacity, reorder, escalate, defer, ring-fence, or hold.